The Fine Living Group of Nashville

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Restaurant Wednesday

Bound'ry

Featuring a menu specializing in contemporary global cuisine with a Southern twist, Bound'ry offers an extensive beer and wine list and traditional or tapas-style dining. Try the wood-fired artichoke, tuna nori roll, wood oven pizzas, planked trout, double pork chop, fresh seafood and our exclusive Creekstone USDA Prime all-natural steaks. Enjoy seasonal outdoor seating.

location:
911 20th Avenue South
Nashville

615.321.3043
pansouth.net

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Top 4 Questions Home Buyers Have About the Tax Credit

RISMEDIA, March 29, 2010—As the April 15 deadline to file 2009 federal tax returns approaches, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) is providing answers to some of the questions home buyers are most frequently asking about the home buyer tax credit.

“NAHB’s website that provides information about the home buyer tax credit, www.FederalHousingTaxCredit.com, has received more than 8 million visits,” said NAHB Chairman Bob Jones, a builder and developer in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. “We are doing everything we can to make sure home buyers are informed about this outstanding opportunity to benefit from buying a home before it expires April 30.”

Some of the more commonly-asked questions, and the answers, include:

1. How does a home buyer claim the tax credit?

The credit is claimed when the home buyer files or amends their federal income taxes. For qualifying homes purchased in 2009 or 2010, the taxpayer must complete IRS Form 5405 and attach a copy of the settlement statement. In most cases, the settlement statement is a properly executed Form HUD-1.

In circumstances where a HUD-1 is not provided, such as purchasing a mobile home or a newly constructed home, the IRS will accept an executed retail sales contract (mobile homes) or a copy of the certificate of occupancy (new homes).

2. Does the home buyer have to sell their current home in order to qualify for the $6,500 repeat home buyer tax credit?

A home buyer does not need to sell their current home in order to be eligible for the repeat buyer credit. They can continue to own both homes, and rent or use their former home for something else, as long as it no longer serves as their principal residence. The taxpayer is required to use the new home as their principal residence, and live in it for at least 36 months, or they will have to repay the credit.

3. Do married couples both have to meet the eligibility requirements in order to claim the credit, even if they file taxes separately?

Both spouses must fully meet all the eligibility requirements for either the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit or the $6,500 repeat buyer tax credit, regardless of if they file joint or separate tax returns. However, if an unmarried couple purchases a home and only one person qualifies, the eligible person may claim the full credit.

4. Do all home purchases need to be completed by April 30, 2010, in order to be eligible for the credit?

There are two exceptions to the April 30 deadline. If the buyer enters into a binding contract by the deadline, they have until June 30, 2010, to complete the purchase. The deadline has been extended a year, to April 30, 2011, for members of the uniformed services, Foreign Service or employees of the intelligence community who have been on qualified extended duty outside the United States for at least 90 days between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2010.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, March 29, 2010

Short Sale/Foreclosure!

The Fine Living Group of Nashville now has a certified short-sale and foreclosure specialist. Please contact us if you are buying/selling; we would love to share our knowledge and expertise with YOU!

Labels: , , , , , ,

8 Tips to Take Advantage of the Home Buyer Tax Credit before Time Runs Out

RISMEDIA, March 27, 2010—RE/MAX agents report that the home buyer tax credit currently can deliver meaningful savings, but only for those who, at a minimum, have a binding contract to purchase a home in place on April 30, 2010. With that deadline bearing down, potential buyers who want to capture the tax credit had better get serious about home shopping.

“It is certainly possible to find a great home and get it under contract in a month or less, but doing it requires intense focus on the part of both the buyer and the buyer’s real estate agent,” said Jim Merrion, regional director of the RE/MAX Northern Illinois real estate network.

Two versions of the tax credit are still being offered: a maximum credit of $8,000 for first-time buyers (and those who last owned a home 3 or more years ago), as well as a $6,500 credit for current homeowners. Either way, the credit applies only to the purchase of a new principal residence costing $800,000 or less, and there are income restrictions and other limitations, including a requirement to close the sale before July 1.

How can buyers eager to capture the tax credit streamline their home shopping?
Here are some suggestions:
1. Get to Know Your Market: Buyers can do that using Internet sites that permit you to see the homes currently on the market, and by finding a good real estate agent who is ready to expedite the shopping process. “A capable agent can guide buyers through the home search process and save them a lot of time,” contends Debbie Laskowski of RE/MAX Select in Chicago. “New listings can be emailed to buyers as they are posted, and buyers should stay on top of the market on a daily basis, seeing what properties are coming onto the market and which ones have sold.”

2. Line Up Your Financing: Talk to a reputable lender right away and go through the pre-approval process. That will tell buyers quickly how much they can borrow. At today’s extremely low interest rates, that amount may be more than many buyers imagined. But either way, the process will help buyers determine how much they are willing and able to spend on the home.

3. Start Narrowing Your Search: With a large inventory of homes to choose from in the current market, buyers won’t have time to look at everything in their price range. By establishing specific criteria of the home they want, buyers can screen out homes that won’t fit their needs. “If you can give your real estate agent answers to two questions: Where do you want to live, and how much can you invest, you should be well on your way to a successful home search,” said Merl Carberry of RE/MAX Suburban in Arlington Heights, Ill.

“When it comes to geography, buyers should factor in their daily commute. Few of us want to be more than 45 minutes from work. If buyers need access to public transit, then that also shapes their choice, and if they have children, schools are going to be a factor. Ideally, you can narrow you search to one or two communities rather quickly.”

4.Separate Needs from Wants: Buyers can look at fewer homes if they can tell their agent what features the home they buy must have and what features would be nice but aren’t required. “When it comes to must haves, start with the basics,” recommends Dan Bundy of RE/MAX Center in Grayslake, Ill. “How many bedrooms are needed? Is a separate home office essential or just desirable? Do you require a basement? Will a two-car garage be sufficient, or do you need something larger? And don’t forget to consider the type of home. Are you interested only in a traditional two-story single-family detached dwelling, or would a ranch plan work just as well? And what about a townhouse?”

5. Consider Condition: In today’s market, many of the best values are foreclosed homes that aren’t in perfect condition. Buyers should decide up front if they are willing to tackle a home that needs work, and if so, how much.

“Buyers often have a hard time articulating what they will accept when it comes to condition,” explained Jim Hannigan of RE/MAX Properties in Western Springs, Ill. “That’s why it is important for a buyer to get out and walk through some properties with their agent as soon as possible. Buyers’ reactions give an agent the clearest picture of their priorities.”

6. Keep Things in Perspective: As nice as it may be to get the tax credit, don’t let the desire to do so completely control your home search. “Some buyers are quick decision makers, and others aren’t,” noted Debbie Laskowski. “If you like to mull over important decisions, take the time you need. The tax credit is a great incentive, but an $8,000 credit equals just 2.5% of the price of a $320,000 home. Buying the wrong home can end up costing you a lot more.”

7. Leave Time to Handle Standard Contingencies: The typical purchase contract may have several contingency clauses, for such things as a home inspection, attorney’s approval, obtaining financing and even the sale of the buyer’s current residence. Fortunately, standard contingencies in a contract won’t prevent it from qualifying for the tax credit, according to Dan Bundy of RE/MAX Center.

However, “the more contingencies you have in a contract, the greater the risk that it won’t close,” said Bundy. For example, if an issue arises in the home inspection, and it can’t be resolved, the buyer may want to find another house, but doing that after April 30 will mean losing the tax credit. Allowing time to work through the contingencies before the deadline reduces that risk.

8. Be Careful of Short Sales: If the home you want to buy is offered as a short sale, qualifying for the tax credit may become more difficult. “Short sales require that purchase offers be approved by both the seller and the sellers’ lender, and lenders often are slow about responding,” said Merl Carberry of RE/MAX Suburban. “Waiting for lender approval could leave you without a binding contract on April 30.”

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, March 26, 2010

Money May be Tight, But Homeowners Still Investing in Great Outdoors

Homeowners love their yards. They plant gardens, create cozy areas for entertaining, and install decorative elements that they’re as happy to look at from the kitchen window as they are from their chaise lounge.

And despite a weak economy, Americans are expected to continue this love affair with the world outside their door—and perhaps spend a little more time in it as they plan to spend their summer vacations at home.

About 94% of residential landscape architects polled by the American Society of Landscape Architects earlier this year said that outdoor living spaces, including cooking and entertaining areas, would be popular in 2010. That said, improvements are expected to have few frills as homeowners stick to the basics in this cool economy.

“Homeowners want to create a sense of place for their family, friends, and neighbors to enjoy outside, but an uncertain economy means many will dial back some of the extra features we’ve seen in past years,” said Nancy Somerville, executive vice president for the group.

According to the survey results, some of the most popular features this year include: outdoor seating and dining areas, including benches and seat-walls or weatherized outdoor furniture, as well as fire pits and fireplaces, the classic outdoor grill and outdoor counter space. More lavish outdoor kitchen appliances, including refrigerators and sinks, are expected to be less popular, as are stereo systems and outdoor heaters. Survey results found a growing interest in low-maintenance landscapes and native plants. There’s also a continued resurgence of the home garden.

While consumers may be planting more as a way to have fresher produce or so they can know where their food is coming from, there’s also an economic driver: According to the National Gardening Association, a well-maintained food garden yields an average $500 return, considering a typical investment and the market price of produce.

A growing market
The interest in spending time outside is likely to beget more products designed for indoor/outdoor use in the near future, according to Rob Tannen and Mathieu Turpault, of Bresslergroup, a product-development firm.

One of the products they imagined: a tray container system that people could take into the garden to collect fruits and vegetables, adapt to fit the sink for cleaning the produce and slide into a refrigerator as you would a crisper drawer. Another concept was a grill with seating built around it, allowing cooks to entertain friends as they work.

Technology will likely play a larger role outdoors, too, Tannen said. It’s not far-fetched to imagine a shed with solar roofing panels that allow you to charge pieces of large lawn equipment, as easily as you might dock your Dustbuster inside the house. Or using iPod apps in the garden to learn how to best take care of a plant, he said.

Already, technology has entered some gardens. EasyBloom, a product that hit the market in 2008, is a sensor that you stick in the ground to collect information about the soil. You then connect it to a computer via a USB port, where collected information is analyzed to help determine what plants will thrive in that area. The tool also can diagnose problems with an existing plant. “People get bummed out when a plant is not doing well,” said Matt Glenn, chief executive of PlantSense, the company that sells EasyBloom. “If you have a rose bush, put the sensor next to the rose bush and the sensor will look at the world the way the rose does.” You’ll quickly learn, for example, if it isn’t getting enough sunlight or has been over-watered—which can be useful for the growing ranks of novice gardeners.

Adding appeal
When designing any outdoor area, it’s important to create a series of places that you can inhabit, whether it’s a covered space to entertain in or a vegetable bed to attend to, said Sarah Susanka, an architect and author of The Not So Big House series of books. Don’t forget your garden’s view from the inside either, she added.

“When I was designing my garden, I designed a view from my kitchen window,” so it could be enjoyed while standing at the kitchen sink, she said. “If you can see something that you find attractive day after day, you’re much more likely to sit out there,” she added.

And while many homeowners are making these outdoor improvements to their homes so they can enjoy them—especially in a real estate market where moving to another home is financially difficult for some families—a well-planned and maintained garden and outdoor area will serve an owner at the time of resale too.

“When you have a beautiful garden, someone will fall in love with it. In fact, it’s what they’re purchasing—more than the house even,” Susanka said.

Arbors, water features such as fountains, pergolas and decks are expected to be the most popular outdoor structures for homeowners this year, according to the architects group. And making an investment in a deck, for example, might set an existing home apart from a newly constructed one, said Edie Kello, director of marketing for Fiberon, a company that manufactures composite decking material.

“Fifteen to 20 years ago, most builders were putting on decks. A lot of construction builders these days aren’t building decks,” Kello said. “I think it’s a cost factor,” she said, adding that when builders were mass producing during the boom years—building as quickly and cost-effectively as possible—home buyers would often get only a stoop outside their door.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 25, 2010

New Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Structures Should Ensure Availability of Mortgage Capital and Protect Taxpayer Dollars, Says NAR

Washington, March 23, 2010

Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be restructured as government-chartered, non-shareholder owned authorities, the National Association of Realtors® said in congressional testimony today.


“We want to ensure a flow of capital into the mortgage market regardless of the state of the market or economy,” Vince Malta, NAR vice president and liaison to government affairs, testified to the House Financial Services Committee. “The new Fannie and Freddie must ensure there is always mortgage capital available for creditworthy buyers and that taxpayer dollars are protected.”


In outlining NAR’s proposal, Malta cautioned Congress and the administration about moving too quickly in restructuring the GSEs. “The housing recovery is still too fragile for the government to completely step away, and any disruption in the marketplace now by doing something too radical would be harmful,” he said. “Our goal is to help Congress and our industry design a secondary mortgage model that will serve America’s best interest today, and in the future.”


Neither a fully privatized entity nor a fully nationalized structure for the secondary mortgage market giants effectively addresses the critical issues of loan availability and taxpayer protection, he said. A fully private entity would foster mortgage products more aligned with business goals rather than the nation’s housing policy for consumers. “In difficult markets, like today’s, private lenders have not been willing to make loans without government backing,” said Malta.


A fully federal structure would put taxpayers at risk. “We want to eliminate any scenario that would place taxpayers on the hook to protect these entities. And to combine the two, or merge them with Ginnie Mae, would remove competition in the secondary market, and the new entity could lose focus on it missions to serve low- and moderate-income families and maintain liquidity in the mortgage markets,” he said.



The new authorities should be subject to tighter regulations on products, profitability and minimal, retained portfolio practices in a way to ensure protection of taxpayer monies. The new entities would also concentrate on standard mortgage products that are the foundation of the housing finance market.


“While that might curtail some private participation and alternative products in this market, we believe privates will offer innovations that meet consumer needs. The new entities would focus on safe mortgage products, including 15- and 30-year fixed rate mortgages and traditional adjustable rate mortgages.”

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Restaurant Wednesday

At Noshville, Authentic New York Delicatessen, the goal is to prepare and serve the highest quality food in a friendly, comfortable atmosphere. Noshville has four convenient locations, and the house rules are simple: "Check your cares at the door, order with reckless abandon, and indulge your senses in the life that is Noshville"

Breakfast is served all day, along with robust delicatessen sandwhiches, hearty homemade soups, refreshing salads and delicious desserts. Voted Best Delicatesssen since 1996. Noshville's friendly professional staff, comfortable atmosphere and great food will keep you coming back for more. "Make Your Mother Happy...Eat and Enjoy!"

Locations:
Cool Springs, Green Hills, Midtown, Noshville Airport
noshville.com

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

4 Options to Stop the Spread of Negative Home Equity

RISMEDIA, March 23, 2010—(MCT)—With home prices expected to keep falling in many parts of the country, experts said finding a fix for the underwater crisis will be difficult. Banks can’t afford to bail out homeowners without another bailout from the government. Even if federal help comes—either for the homeowner directly or for banks—taxpayers ultimately will be on the hook for the debt. Do nothing, and homeowners and communities continue to suffer.

One economist said it all boils down to one thing: sharing the pain. “At the end of the day, someone has to pay for this problem—either the lender, the homeowner or the public pays,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com. “It is really about divvying up the cost, and that is very difficult politically to do.”

The Obama administration said last month it would allocate $1.5 billion to five states to create programs that target unemployed homeowners struggling to avoid foreclosure, as well as people underwater on their mortgages. The programs would also focus on helping people with second mortgages modify their loans.

Here’s a look at some other options and what experts say about them:

Principal reductions
One way to solve the negative equity problem is to simply get rid of it. That would require banks to modify loans—and write down the principal owed to reflect a home’s value on the current market. Proponents of this solution argue that it is more costly to continue the cycle of foreclosures. But lenders would face large losses if they wrote down large portions of their loans.

Zandi said some lenders are doing this when it makes sense. Under the Obama administration home loan modification program, lenders can write down or defer principal if the borrower’s debt-to-income ratio is greater than 31%. Principal write-downs typically are being done when the homeowner wants to stay in the house and the lender doesn’t think it can sell the house to recoup what is owed.

He also predicts lenders will engage in more short sales, where they write down the difference between what is owed on the mortgage and what a buyer is willing to pay, to avoid costly foreclosures.

Julia Gordon, senior policy counsel for the nonprofit Center for Responsible Lending, agrees that principal reduction is one of the better ways to start healing the housing market.

But it gets complicated when there are second mortgages or lines of credit, common when economic pressures left little equity in some people’s homes. She said there is often a conflict of interest when the mortgage, or first lien, is held by one lender and the second is held by a different one. Lenders often don’t want to approve reducing principal on the first lien unless the second lien holder also takes a hit. “If the second liens disappear, that would clear servicers to do more principal reductions,” she said.

Rick Sharga, senior vice president of RealtyTrac Inc., an Irvine, Calif.-based foreclosure website, said he doubts that banks will write down principal in large numbers. “Many are in a capital position where they can’t afford to do that,” Sharga said. “The glimmer of hope is we figure 2010 will be the peak of foreclosure activity.”

RealtyTrac expects 3.5 million properties nationally to receive a foreclosure filing this year, up from 2.8 million last year.

Stabilize home prices
Gail Madziar, spokeswoman for the Michigan Bankers Association, said some banks are even leasing homes they foreclosed on back to the original owners to help stabilize home prices and neighborhoods.

Another way to stabilize prices is to control the release of distressed inventory onto the market. Banks have been doing this in recent months to slow the erosion of home prices and minimize the losses they record on their books.

Help for unemployed workers
The Mortgage Bankers Association announced recently that it was considering a program to help qualified borrowers who have lost their jobs so they can stay in their homes while they seek new employment.

The forbearance program would have loan servicers reducing the borrower’s mortgage payment for up to nine months. The payment would be reduced to an affordable level based on household income.

John Courson, president and CEO of the association, said that the average U.S. worker is unemployed for up to seven months and that is a long time for a homeowner to stay current on the mortgage with such a large drop in income.

“Further, borrowers with such a precipitous drop in income can’t qualify for most loan modification programs, so we are looking for ways to allow those borrowers to keep their homes while they look for another job,” he said.

The association has asked the government to add this tool to the Home Affordable Modification Program to help the swelling ranks of unemployed people.

Gordon of the Center for Responsible Lending said another solution might be to provide a low-cost loan fund like one in Pennsylvania that unemployed homeowners can tap into to pay their mortgages. The Homeowners’ Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program was created in 1983 to prevent homelessness in Pennsylvania by offering loans of up to $60,000 for 24 months. In times of high unemployment, the loans extend to three years.

Freeze foreclosures
Michigan state Sen. Hansen Clarke, a Democrat who sponsored 90-day foreclosure moratorium legislation that took effect last July, said he thinks judges should be given the power to temporarily suspend foreclosures for up to two years. “Look at all the people who have had to walk away from their houses. I get so angry when I see these neighborhoods, because action could have been taken,” Clarke said.

Gordon said a temporary suspension could be helpful if servicers use that time to evaluate the homeowner for a loan modification. Now, the foreclosure process and evaluation process generally are happening at the same time, sending mixed messages to homeowners.

Tim Ross, president of Royal Oak, Mich.-based Ross Mortgage, said that more mortgage loan servicers are eager to keep people in their homes these days and that could go a long way to solving the negative equity problem.

On top of that, new household formation, which occurs when young adults leave home to set up their own places or when people get married or divorced, continues to create demand for new homes. And with new home building at a standstill, demand driven from household formation should absorb what’s in the market, he said.

“Despite the fact that we have outmigration, there are fundamentals in place that will ultimately rescue us,” Ross said.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, March 22, 2010

Fixer-Upper Financing: 203k Program Provides Buyers with Renovation Funds

The word “as-is” can indeed be one scary phrase. Especially when buying a home in today’s market where foreclosures and short sales that need fix-up work are plentiful.

But a little-known Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan program that’s been around since 1978 can help take the sting out of “as-is.” Only 219 borrowers took advantage of the FHA’s 203k program in 2009. Not that many lending and real estate professionals are aware of the program, say observers.

Last year, Tom Meyer found a classic Oakland, Calif., home built in 1925 near Mills College he liked a lot. As a short sale it was priced right and about half the original asking price. Trouble was, the place needed some fix-up work—foundation improvements, dry rot work, a new roof over the garage and other improvements.

With the help of the FHA’s 203k renovation financing loan program, Meyer folded about $100,000 worth of repairs and improvements into his $422,000 mortgage. He had bought the home for $320,000. “I would not be able to pay a contractor $100,000 and buy a house at the same time,” said Meyer, who works in corporate media at Shaklee’s Pleasanton headquarters. “It had been essentially allowed to start falling apart over the last 20 years.”

He had rented in San Francisco for 25 years before moving into his new digs last September with his girlfriend, Cathy Keating. “We like old houses, and a great benefit of this program is that it helped us keep a beautiful but deteriorating house from deteriorating further. With the work we did, we expect it to still be standing and beautiful 80 years from now,” he said.

Renovation financing through the 203k program allows the costs of needed repairs and improvements to be included in the FHA federally-insured loan amount instead of having the buyer come up with cash or a separate loan to do the work.

“This is a perfect loan for an as-is situation,” said Kristine Marr, a loan officer with Prospect Mortgage in Lafayette, Calif. “It’s not a new loan program, although I think it’s going to have a lot more use today because we have so many foreclosures and bank-owned properties. You go into lots of homes and see people have yanked out stoves and ovens and fixtures and sinks.”

The work has to be done within six months after escrow closes. Borrowers have the option of putting up to six months of mortgage payments on the end of the loan if they don’t want to live in the house while the work is being done.

“Renovation financing is a program that allows you to not only finance the purchase of a home but finance any repairs and/or improvements. It provides buyers with a responsible way to purchase a fixer-upper property,” said Luis C. Munoz, who helped Meyer with the loan and is a renovation loan specialist with the Oakland branch of Mason-McDuffie Mortgage Corp. Munoz also gives presentations about the program at monthly home ownership workshops sponsored by the Unity Council, an Oakland-based nonprofit.

At a time when equity loans are hard to get, the program can also be used as a refinancing vehicle for borrowers who want to do repairs and improvements, provided the value of the home is greater than the value of the loan. “At the same time as you refinance, you pop in the extra dollars you need for whatever you want to do,” Marr said.

FHA home loans require certain health and safety standards be met and that needed repairs identified during the inspection process be completed before escrow closes. However, minor repairs and improvements costing between $5,000 and $15,000 can be done after escrow closes for borrowers who opt for a streamlined repair program.

A 203k loan can help buyers finance both minor and major repairs and improvements. It can also help buyers compete with investors when bidding for short sales and foreclosures, said Sheri Powers, director of the Homeownership Center at Unity Council.

The loans can also be used to pay for improvements such as new appliances, second-story additions, remodeled kitchens and bathrooms, and skylights, just to name a few examples. “Property repairs cost money and they want to make sure people using their loan program are going to be in the home in long run and not just the short run,” Powers said.

The loans have become more popular since home prices started falling and FHA lending limits were raised a couple years ago but are still a tiny sliver of overall FHA loan volume. Last year, 203k loans accounted for 219 mortgages in the Bay Area, compared to 35 in 2008, one in 2007 and none in 2005 and 2006, according to Department of Housing and Urban Development statistics. “It’s making a comeback,” said Powers.

Marr said that 203k financing is not for everyone. A buyer will have to work with contractors and may have to wait several months before moving in, she said. And there is no guarantee they won’t be outbid by an investor for the property. “A lot of listing agents are preferring the investors, because the investors tend to be all cash or 50% cash. That’s always hard to compete with,” she said.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, March 19, 2010

Gwyneth Paltrow Loves Nashville!

Please check out this blog for Gwyneth's best pick's in Nashville!

Labels: , , , ,

10 Staging Tips to Help Your Home Sell

Want to sell your home? Get out the bucket, mop and Mr. Clean. The key to making a positive first impression is simple, said Sandra Rinomato, host of HGTV’s popular “Property Virgins” show.

“Get it clean, clean, clean,” said Rinomato. “If your house isn’t clean, it instantly sends up negative thoughts that the home is not well maintained. If your house is spotless, you’re ahead of the game,” she said.

But don’t stop there, advised Rinomato. To increase your chances of making a sale, “stage” the house to make it as attractive as possible. Until recently, “Staging meant pulling out all the stops—setting the dining table with your best china and crystal, arranging flowers, lighting candles,” she said. “Now we take the minimalist approach. Basically, you want to strip the house to its bare essentials, depersonalize it so potential buyers can superimpose themselves and their lifestyle on the house.”

Rinomato offered the following tips for staging a home:

1. Visit model homes and examine shelter magazines for inexpensive decorating ideas. Always keep in mind you are not decorating for yourself but for the general public.

2. Start with the outside. Give the house a fresh coat of paint, add shiny hardware to the front door and plant a few flowers to send a subliminal message the house is loved and well cared for.

3. Declutter every room to make it look larger. Get rid of family pictures, trophies and knickknacks. Closets and drawers should be no more than 30% full.

4. Invest in eco-friendly but bright lights. Open the drapes or remove them completely. “Light, bright rooms give the impression this is a happy place—and everyone wants to move into a happy place,” said Rinomato.

5. Feature only a few pieces of furniture with mainstream appeal. Pull pieces away from walls to make rooms look bigger.

6. Make sure a room’s primary use is obvious. A bedroom should look like a bedroom, not an office, hobby center or gym.

7. Bedrooms and kitchens are difficult to stage because they are in daily use, but make the effort. Clear everything off the counters and nightstands, roll up the rugs and hide the laundry hamper. Buff the cabinets with car wax and clean under the sinks. Invest in pristine white bed linens and towels.

8. Minimize the “pet effect.” Remove food bowls and litter boxes to the utility room. Deodorize thoroughly.

9. Organize the utility room and garage. Hang up the bicycles, roll up the hose. Renting a storage locker is worth the cost if it helps you sell faster and for a higher price.

10. Once your house is staged, invite your friends or Realtor over and walk them through to get an objective opinion.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Short Sales: The Rise, the Revenue, the Reality

Distressed homes are still accounting for more than a third of all sales nationwide, providing evidence that real estate recovery is still fragile at best. While there is no magic bullet for understanding or navigating the short sale process, Realtors who excel at managing these transactions will find success in today’s market. In this month’s Power Broker Roundtable, industry leaders Terry Hankner, Helen Hanna Casey and Larry Hibler discuss how to take advantage of the distressed market.

Moderator:
Steve Brown, Special Liaison for Large Firm Relations, NAR

Participants:
Terry Hankner, President Comey & Shepherd REALTORS®, Cincinnati, Ohio
Helen Hanna Casey, President, Howard Hanna Real Estate Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Larry Hibler, Broker, RE/MAX Achievers, Phoenix, Arizona

Steve Brown: While sales dropped slightly in December of 2009, the overall rate of existing home sales at the close of the fourth quarter was 15% higher than it was in the year-ago period. The price median rose a bit to post the first year-over-year gain since 2007, as inventory continues to shrink. That is reason for optimism as we move into the spring sales season. But since distressed homes are still accounting for more than a third of all sales nationwide, it is safe to say that recovery is fragile at best—and that until the jobless rate improves, the success rate will be highest for those REALTORS® who excel at managing short sales.

But therein lies the rub. The truth is there is no magic bullet for understanding, much less navigating the muddy waters of the short sale process…although there is now some hope on the horizon thanks to the upcoming Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA) developed by the Treasury Department. Designed to simplify and streamline the use of short sales, the expected benefits of HAFA include: allowing borrowers to receive pre-approved short sale terms before listing the property; requiring borrowers to be fully released from future liability for their first mortgage debt; and the use of standard processes, documents and deadlines in the short sale process. For more details, visit www.REALTOR.org/shortsales and remember that NAR also provides a dynamic Short Sales and Foreclosure Resource Certification (SFR) course to help educate members on this growing issue. More information can be found at www.realtorsfr.org.

Terry Hankner: Well, I don’t think there is any doubt that the problem begins with the lenders, who by and large have never clearly defined the issues or offered any reliable guidelines. What’s worse, their communication, in my opinion, has been lacking—excruciatingly slow and inconsistent.

Helen Hanna Casey: Yes, it’s been tough to even get a call back with any kind of timeliness, and that wears on everybody’s patience, agents, sellers and buyers. We try to get around that by relying on our most experienced agents—REO specialists who have long-time lender contacts and tend to have the best success rate.

Larry Hibler: The good news, at least in Arizona, is that we’re beginning to see some progress with that. Some lenders seem to be finally gearing up. We actually got one approval in seven days last month.

HHC: Amazing! How did that happen?

LH: Well, for one thing, we place a lot of importance on impressing the lender with the buyer’s strength and commitment. We submit only one contract at a time and the buyer has to put down non-refundable earnest money for a period of 60-90 days.


SB: What about seller issues?

HHC: We have high unemployment in Ohio, but I don’t think we had as much subprime lending or zero-down buying going on during the peak, so the problems may not be as dire here as in some areas. But all our agents are well trained in the financial alternatives so they can work with sellers who may be in trouble.

TH: The issues for us are disclosure, disclosure, disclosure, to be sure the sellers understand their options, whether short sale, foreclosure, loan modification or whatever. We use a program we call “Fresh Start,” which we present upfront as a for-profit entity designed to educate the seller, negotiate with the lender and handle any eventual sale of property. It took us two-and-a-half years to come up with the process, but we did do over 100 transactions last year, and our agents are not shy about referring business to this more experienced group.

LH: We’ve had good results using third party negotiators, who handle short sales for a flat fee. I’m comfortable with that from a liability point of view, and it takes responsibility off our agents.

HHC: It also takes the pressure off of having to deal with the banks ourselves. I don’t know whether some banks are just lagging in getting systems in place—like when there is a merger or acquisition—or whether they are deliberately stonewalling. Either way, it is exasperating.

SB: What needs to happen in order to see an improvement?

TH: Basically, the industry needs to do two things: the first is to reduce our risk in negotiating short sales, which is why disclosure is so important. The second is to hold lenders accountable for clarifying and articulating the ground rules. My worst nightmare is that, a year from now, some lender will come back after a seller and say, “we never really let you off the hook.”

HHC: I don’t think that’s going to happen unless there’s been fraud or collusion of some kind, but I do agree that disclosure is paramount, and that sellers would do well to seek legal counsel before they make a decision.

LH: I do think, though, that the banks are beginning to catch up with us and that the process shows signs of improving. I hope so, especially now that there is some stirring in the higher end of the market. Now we need to hope for continued improvement in the economy.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Restaurant Wednesday

Sunset Grill

Located in the heart of Hillsboro Village, Sunset Grill is the jewel in the triple crown of Nashville's most successful independent restaurateur, Randy Rayburn. The California-influenced cuisine has remained contemporary and fresh for almost two decades with daily specials that lure diners off-menu. Sunset serves 65 wines by the glass and 500 by the bottle. Offering free shuttle service to downtown hotels.

2001 Belcourt Ave
Nashville

615.386.3663
sunsetgrill.com

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

NAR Urges Congress, Administration to Approach Changing FHA Slowly

The National Association of Realtors® urged Congress and the administration to move cautiously before making changes to the Federal Housing Administration program that has served the needs of millions of American families for more than 75 years without needing a federal appropriation.

FHA remains financially strong because it has taken steps to ensure solid underwriting standards and responsible lending practices, said Charles McMillan, NAR immediate past president, in testimony before the House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity today.

“As the leading advocate for housing issues, NAR believes that one of the best ways Congress can help strengthen FHA is to quickly consider and pass legislation that would make current loan limits permanent,” McMillan said. “It’s important to note that higher balance FHA loans perform better than lower balance ones. While some argue that higher balance loans put taxpayers at risk, such loans actually strengthen the program and reduce risk to the fund.”

NAR strongly supports H.R. 2483, the “Increasing Homeownership Opportunities Act.” Current FHA loan limits are as high as $729,750 in high-cost areas, and are set to expire at the end of the year and revert to lower amounts, greatly hindering the housing recovery process. A decrease of current limits would adversely affect 612 counties in 40 states and the District of Columbia.

Explaining that FHA has played an important role in the recent housing and economic crisis by filing the gap left by private lenders, McMillan said FHA insured almost 30 percent of single-family mortgages in 2009 and more than 50 percent of first-time buyer loans. “Historically, FHA’s market share has hovered between 10 and 15 percent of all loans. And when the private market is strong enough to return, we welcome a reduced FHA market share,” he said.

McMillan said NAR strongly opposes H.R. 3706 that would raise the FHA downpayment. “While that would increase an individual’s investment in the home, it would not add a penny to FHA’s reserves and would disenfranchise many FHA borrowers,” he said.

NAR also opposes a new FHA initiative that increased the up-front mortgage insurance premium (MIP) from 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent because it adds to the closing costs home buyers already face. NAR supports legislation to reasonably increase the annual MIP to replace FHA capital reserves, but in turn, FHA should reduce the up-front premium due at the closing table.

McMillan said NAR was also concerned that FHA wanted to decrease seller concessions to 3 percent. Reducing seller concessions could put homeownership out of reach for many buyers, he said, because it could require buyers to pay more at closing.

McMillan applauded FHA’s stepped up enforcement and oversight of lenders making FHA loans. In 2009, FHA removed approval of or suspended 274 lenders. “Realtors® support adding more tools to help FHA protect borrowers and taxpayers,” he said.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, March 15, 2010

Poll Shows Strong Support for Government Housing Initiatives

RISMEDIA, March 5, 2010—Americans remain strongly committed to federal support for home buyers, according to a recent survey of U.S. households.

Roughly 68% of those polled said the government should continue to support housing, and 65% believe the government should be doing more to keep families from losing their homes to foreclosure.

The poll included both home owners and renters and was conducted for the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) by RT Strategies, a non-partisan public opinion polling firm based in Washington, D.C. RT Strategies interviewed a representative sample of 1,000 adults nationwide by telephone using live interviewers on January 29-31, 2010. The sample included 170 interviews with respondents from cell-phone-only households.

Among those polled, some key groups said the government should continue to play a vital role in maintaining a healthy housing market. For example, 78% of all potential home buyers, including 81% of renters intending to buy a home in the near future, said the government should continue to support housing.

Roughly 65% of home owners said the government also needs to do more to keep families from losing their homes. Support for more foreclosure protection was not confined merely to current home owners. Among renters, 84% said the government needs to do more to helped strapped borrowers. This issue is particularly important to women, with 71% supporting greater foreclosure protection, compared to 58% of men.

Keeping families in their homes is also particularly important to first-time home buyers, as 78% of young adults under age 30 support greater foreclosure protection. And 69% of adults who are 30 to 44, the prime age range for move-up buyers, said they support more foreclosure protection.

Overall, roughly two-in-three respondents said they own their home. Among renters, about two-in-three intend to buy a home in the near future. In addition, 15% of current home owners intend to buy a home in the near future.

The poll asked respondents for their views regarding the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 that extended a tax credit of up to $8,000 for qualified first-time home buyers purchasing a principal residence. The legislation, which was signed into law by President Obama in November 2009, also authorized a tax credit of up to $6,500 for qualified repeat home buyers. Overall, 8% of those surveyed said they intend to take advantage of this credit, while another 24% who might have been interested in using the tax credit said they cannot afford to purchase a home at this time. Of the 33% of respondents who said they are planning to buy a home (both renters and current home owners), roughly 17% said they intend to use the tax credit.

Financial concerns continue to be the greatest barrier to growth in the housing market. Among renters nationwide who aspire to own their own home, 39% simply don’t have the money to buy a home at this time, and another 20% said the primary obstacle is that they feel they cannot qualify for a loan. Larger economic issues also play a role, as 18% of those surveyed said that job security is the greatest obstacle they face in trying to buy a home.

Weakness in the housing market itself may be blocking some home owners who would like to buy a new home, as 29% of current home owners said their greatest obstacle to purchasing another home is their inability to sell their current home. Beyond that, among current homeowners who aspire to buy a new home, 7% feel trapped by a mortgage that exceeds the value of their current home, 14% fear that the value of a new home might fall after they make the investment, and 13% say home prices are too high to allow them to buy a new home at this time.

Even amid a housing market downturn, 40% of respondents said their home is their most valuable investment, twice the number who cite any other single investment–401k accounts, savings accounts and CDs, stocks and bonds, or mutual funds–as their leading family investment.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, March 12, 2010

5 Tips for a Successful Home Remodel

As spring approaches, many homeowners grow eager to start remodeling projects to update and refresh their surroundings. Before getting started, it’s a good idea to hire a professional remodeler for a workable plan and better results, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

“A professional remodeler knows how to translate a homeowner’s dreams and budget into a beautiful reality,” said Donna Shirey, CGR, CAPS, CGP, president of Shirey Contracting in Issaquah, Wash. and 2010 chairman of NAHB Remodelers. “They have the expertise and skills to satisfy a customer while keeping the budget in check.”

Here are five tips for planning a successful home remodel that you can enjoy for many years to come.

1. Compile a list of home remodeling ideas and draft a budget for the work.
You likely have some projects in mind, such as modernizing the bathroom, renovating the kitchen, replacing windows or repairing the roof. Prioritize your wish list: Maybe you don’t have the budget for your dream remodel, but professional remodelers can maximize your dollars by doing the work in phases, suggesting budget-friendly products and materials and implementing creative design solutions.

2. Look for a professional remodeler to help plan the project.
Start by searching NAHB’s Directory of Professional Remodelers at www.nahb.org/remodel. You’ll get a list of nearby remodelers to contact. Asking friends and neighbors for names of qualified remodelers will also help you find a match for your project.

3. Check the references and background of the remodeler.
After you start speaking with remodelers and find one or two who match your project’s needs, be sure to conduct some background research by checking with the Better Business Bureau, talking to their references and asking if they are a trade association member (such as NAHB Remodelers). Remodelers with these qualities tend to be more reliable, better educated and more likely to stay on top of construction and design trends.

4. Agree on a contract.
Talk over the details of the home remodeling project and begin reviewing the contract. You’ll want to check the remodelers’ insurance coverage, ask about any warranties on their work, know who is responsible for obtaining any building permits and understand the process for making any change orders after the contract is signed. Make sure that you and your remodeler see eye to eye before you sign on the dotted line.

5. Take advantage of the energy efficiency tax credits.
If your remodel includes replacing windows or doors, adding insulation, installing new roofing, upgrading heating or air-conditioning units, updating the water heater or installing energy generating products (such as solar panels, heat pumps or wind turbines) then you can take advantage of federal energy efficiency tax credits through 2010 that will help defray costs and maximize your remodeling budget while reducing home energy bills.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 11, 2010

U.S. Foreclosure Activity Decreases 2% in February 2010

RISMEDIA, March 11, 2010—RealtyTrac, a leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, released its February 2010 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, which shows foreclosure filings—default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions—were reported on 308,524 U.S. properties during the month, a decrease of 2% from the previous month but still 6% above the level reported in February 2009. The report also shows one in every 418 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing in February.

“The 6% year-over-year increase we saw in February was the smallest annual increase we’ve seen since January 2006, when we began calculating year-over-year increases, but it still marked the 50th consecutive month of year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “This leveling of the foreclosure trend is not necessarily evidence that fewer homeowners are in distress and at risk for foreclosure, but rather that foreclosure prevention programs, legislation and other processing delays are in effect capping monthly foreclosure activity—albeit at a historically high level that will likely continue for an extended period.

“In addition, severe winter weather appears to have temporarily slowed the processing of foreclosure records in some Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states.”

Foreclosure activity by type
Default notices (Notices of Default and Lis Pendens) were reported on a total of 106,208 U.S. properties during the month, an increase of 3% from the previous month but down 3% from February 2009. Default notices were down 25% from their peak of more than 142,000 in April 2009 but were still more than three times the number they were four years ago in February 2006.

Foreclosure auctions (Notices of Trustee’s Sale and Notices of Sheriff’s Sales) were scheduled for the first time on a total of 123,633 U.S. properties, a decrease of 1% from the previous month but still 16% higher than the level reported in February 2009. Scheduled auctions were down 14% from their peak of more than 144,000 in August 2009 but were also about three times higher than the number reported in February 2006.

Bank repossessions (REOs) were reported on a total of 78,683 U.S. properties during the month, a 10% decrease from the previous month but an increase of 6% from February 2009. Bank repossessions were down nearly 15% from their peak of more than 92,000 in December 2009 but were at nearly twice the level reported in February 2006.

Nevada, Arizona, Florida post top state foreclosure rates
Nevada foreclosure activity decreased nearly 7% from the previous month and was down 30% from February 2009, but the state’s foreclosure rate continued to rank highest in the nation for the 38th month in a row. One in every 102 Nevada housing units received a foreclosure filing during the month—more than four times the national average.

Arizona and Florida documented nearly identical foreclosure rates, with one in every 163 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in both states. Despite a nearly 21% decrease in foreclosure activity from the previous month, Arizona’s rate was statistically slightly higher than Florida’s rate and ranked second highest among the states.

California’s foreclosure rate ranked fourth highest among the states, with one in every 195 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing during the month, and Michigan’s foreclosure rate ranked fifth highest among the states, with one in every 226 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.

Other states with foreclosure rates among the nation’s 10 highest were Utah (one in every 275 housing units), Idaho (one in 296), Illinois (one in 305), Georgia (one in 331) and Maryland (one in 407).

Six states account for more than 60% of national total
The six states with the most foreclosure activity accounted for 61% of the national total in February. California led the way, with 68,562 properties receiving a foreclosure filing during the month—down nearly 5% from the previous month and down 15% from February 2009.

Foreclosure activity in Florida increased nearly 15% from the previous month and was up more than 16% from February 2009. The state continued to post the nation’s second highest total, with 54,032 properties received a foreclosure filing during the month.

Increasing foreclosure activity boosted Michigan’s total to third highest among the states. A total of 20,028 Michigan properties received a foreclosure filing during the month—up nearly 14% from the previous month and up 59% from February 2009.

With 17,312 properties receiving a foreclosure filing, Illinois posted the fourth highest total, followed by Arizona, with 16,718 properties receiving a foreclosure filing, and Texas, with 12,638 properties receiving a foreclosure filing in February.

Other states with totals among the 10 highest in the country were Georgia (12,177), Ohio (11,286), Nevada (11,035), and Maryland (5,732).

Divergent trends in metro areas with top 10 foreclosure rates
Metro areas in the Sun Belt states of Nevada, Florida, California and Arizona continued to dominate the top 10 highest foreclosure rates among metropolitan areas with a population of 200,000 or more, but activity trends in these areas varied considerably.

The Las Vegas metro area documented the highest metro foreclosure rate, with one in every 90 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing during the month, despite a 9% decrease in foreclosure activity from the previous month.

Six of the other metro areas in the top 10—all in California or Arizona—also reported decreasing foreclosure activity from the previous month. The biggest monthly decrease among the top 10 was in the Phoenix metro area, where foreclosure activity dropped nearly 18%.

In contrast, the two Florida metro areas in the top 10 both posted substantial monthly increases in foreclosure activity. The Cape Coral-Fort Myers metro area saw a 31% increase in foreclosure activity from the previous month, giving it the second highest metro foreclosure rate—one in every 92 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing. An increase of nearly 66% in foreclosure activity from the previous month helped boost the foreclosure rate in Port St. Lucie to sixth highest.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Rumba

Tropical flair and low-lit intimacy combine with top-notch Latin, Asian and Caribbean cuisine at rumba, where globe-trotting tastes have found a home on West End. Sip a hand-muddled mojito or caipirinha on one of the double patios or at the main bar, then relax in a secluded booth with a meal for afar.

Location:
3009 West End Ave
Nashville

615.321.1350

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Real Relief for Upside Down Home Owners

RISMEDIA, March 9, 2010—Forget loan modifications, short sales, and “jingle mail”! If you are one of an estimated 50 to 60 million homeowners whose mortgage is part of a securitized pool, the law is on your side and everyday more and more people are deciding to exercise their rights with regard to the documents they signed.

There is much more contained within those documents and pooling and servicing agreements that govern the pools than just the borrowers promise to pay. And, there are laws that must be adhered to by the lender of the money.

As it turns out, virtually all of the securitized private label loans were part of a massive and ongoing fraud upon both the borrower and the investor. And, the fraud continues as the pretender lenders force more defaults, stop making payments to the pools, collect on the credit default swaps, and top it all off by seizing the underlying assets (only if they can make additional money on them) and keeping any proceeds for themselves.

What borrowers and investors agreed to and what they actually got are at odds, and these discrepancies raise serious legal issues including, but not limited to, Truth In Lending Violations, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Violations, Fraud, Bait and Switch, illegal kickbacks involving the borrower, and out right fraud and conversion upon the investor.

In the cases of loans such as a 2/28, pick-a-pay and option arm, their very existence is prima facie evidence of predatory lending and fraud upon the investors.

Nor are we talking about a small amount of money or a technicality. We are talking about a complex system of deceit by financial intermediaries that can turn a single modest home loan into millions of dollars in profit for them.

The Worse the Loan the More They Can Make

Suppose a buyer actually qualifies for a $300,000 fully amortized, fixed rate loan at 5%.

But, right at the end of the process the underwriter calls the loan officer and says something like this;

“We’ve just had a change to our underwriting guidelines and we aren’t going to fund the loan.”

This is really funny because the loan is already funded. Now, it’s time to kick up the profits. Of course, the loan officer’s emotions run the full range from disbelief to anger to fear. “Why?” She pleads.

Underwriter: “His ratios. He needs a lower monthly payment. Resubmit in our new super-duper, magical flex loan with the built in implosion feature.”

Now, before we run out and lynch a bunch of loan officers, this is what they were given to work with and trained to do. They were as indoctrinated into this as if they had drunk the cool aid. If it makes you feel better, they got pushed into these loans too. I get a lot of email from loan originators and real estate agents who often feel embarrassed about their choices, but back then we didn’t know that it was just a giant Ponzi scheme.

The loan product is determined by an underwriter. The perception is that the only purpose for underwriting is to determine the credit worthiness of the borrower and the value of the security. But, the underwriting process actually yields far more valuable information. It also reveals the borrower’s default probability and numerous details about their behavior. Knowledge of the borrower’s behavior combined with negative features in the loan allowed insiders to project when the loan would default.

Armed with this information, the underwriter is able to “tweak” the loan to increase the Yield Spread Premium and the Service Release Premium, as well as, increase the likelihood of collecting on the credit default swaps. That is the process of putting you into the most profitable loan possible. And, it is where the real predatory lending takes place.

Back to our borrower. By bumping our highly qualified borrower from 5% to 8%, they only increase the likelihood of default; they are able to extract an enormous undisclosed Service Release Premium and a Yield Spread Premium. The Yield Spread Premium is supposed to be disclosed, but often isn’t.

The Service Release Premium is where the real money is, and it’s hidden. The investor provides $480,000 to the financial intermediary in exchange for a five percent annual return of $24,000 plus a guaranteed return of principal.

The financial intermediary only loans our borrower $300,000, but when the rate adjusts to 8%, the investor has his $24,000 annual income, the financial intermediary pockets a $180,000 Service Release Premium, makes up the initial shortfall in the pool payments and buys credit default swaps.

So this is where we really are.

They are not banks. They call themselves banks, but they aren’t banks.

They did not lend you any money. They loaned you someone else’s money.

You don’t owe them any money. Maybe you owe a pension fund or something, maybe not.

You may not owe anyone any money. If the investors recouped their losses from TARP funds, you no longer owe them anything.

They may owe you money. If you were the victim of predatory lending, your damages could be into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, plus legal expenses

They may have no legal right to foreclose on you.

You have a legal right under the terms of your loan agreement and common law to raise the above issues with the true holder of the original note you signed.

Why? Because securitized loans presented an opportunity to commit fraud on both the true lender by skimming, and the borrower by convincing him he should accept a far more expensive loan than the one for which he qualified.

The financial intermediary wrote the pooling and servicing agreements and the credit default swaps. The terms of the pooling and servicing agreement allow the financial intermediary to stop making payments on all loans in the pool and keep the revenue stream from the performing loans when a default occurs within the pool. It also allows the financial intermediary to collect on the credit default swap on the entire pool which is multiples of the loan value of the entire pool.

The game was rigged, but they overlooked one little thing; The Uniform Commercial Code, Chapter 3, 47-3110. The Uniform Commercial Code is replicated in virtually every state, and this section governs who may enforce a note.

Look at this a different way. Suppose you wanted to pay off your loan, but you wanted to be absolutely certain that the money would go to the rightful party so that you would not be subject to someone showing up later claiming you never paid off your note. You have a legal right to know who that party is.

If they cannot satisfy this provision of the UCC, they cannot proceed to foreclose. If you wanted to take the fight to them and see if they can produce the note, this is the law you need to pursue.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, March 8, 2010

Is It the Beginning of the End for Housing Crisis?

RISMEDIA, March 8, 2010—(MCT)—A smaller percentage of mortgages were delinquent and the rate of those entering the foreclosure process slowed in the fourth quarter of 2009, possible signs that the foreclosure crisis that has gripped many of the nation’s housing markets is finally starting to ease, a trade group has reported.

“We are likely seeing the beginning of the end of the unprecedented wave of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures that started with the subprime defaults in early 2007,” said Jay Brinkmann, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association, in a written statement.

The delinquency rate for mortgages on one- to four-unit residential properties was a seasonally adjusted 9.47% of all mortgages outstanding in the fourth quarter, down from 9.64% in the third quarter and up from 7.88% in the fourth quarter of 2008, according to the MBA’s quarterly delinquency survey.

Delinquencies include mortgages that are at least one payment or more past due but not yet in foreclosure.

Meanwhile, 1.2% of outstanding mortgages entered the foreclosure process in the fourth quarter, down from 1.42% in the third quarter and up from 1.08% in the fourth quarter of 2008. The percentage of mortgages at some point in the foreclosure process at the end of the fourth quarter was 4.58%, up from 4.47% in the third quarter and 3.3% in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The MBA survey covers about 44.4 million loans on one- to four-unit residential properties, or about 85% of all first-lien residential mortgage loans that are outstanding in the country. No doubt, the foreclosure nightmare isn’t over yet.

The percentages of loans 90 days or more past due and loans in foreclosure process set record highs in the fourth quarter, according to the report. Many of those loans more than 90 days past due are in loan modification programs, and some of them have been seriously delinquent for months waiting for modifications to get finalized.

But the good news is there are fewer problem loans actually entering delinquency—likely a result of fewer layoffs, Brinkmann said. “We normally see a large spike in short-term mortgage delinquencies at the end of the year due to heating bills, Christmas expenditures and other seasonal factors. Not only did we not see that spike but the 30-day delinquencies actually fell by 16 basis points from 3.79% to 3.63%,” he said. He added that the non-seasonally adjusted 30-day delinquency rate has only dropped three times in the past between the third and fourth quarter—”and never by this magnitude.”

Depending on the fate of seriously delinquent mortgages—whether they are cured with modifications or ultimately enter foreclosure—the percentage of mortgages somewhere in the foreclosure process could start to see a gradual decline in the second half of the year, he said during a conference call with reporters.

If normal seasonal patterns hold, there could be a bigger drop in the 30-day delinquency rate in the first quarter of 2010, Brinkmann said. That would be a positive sign for the months and years ahead. “The continued and sizable drop in the 30-day delinquency rate is a concrete sign that the end may be in sight,” he said. “With fewer new loans going bad, the pool of seriously delinquent loans and foreclosures will eventually begin to shrink once the rate at which these problems are resolved exceeds the rate at which new problems come in. “It also gives us growing confidence that the size of the problem now is about as bad as it will get,” he said.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, March 5, 2010

Poll Shows Strong Support for Government Housing Initiatives

RISMEDIA, March 5, 2010—Americans remain strongly committed to federal support for home buyers, according to a recent survey of U.S. households.

Roughly 68% of those polled said the government should continue to support housing, and 65% believe the government should be doing more to keep families from losing their homes to foreclosure.

The poll included both home owners and renters and was conducted for the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) by RT Strategies, a non-partisan public opinion polling firm based in Washington, D.C. RT Strategies interviewed a representative sample of 1,000 adults nationwide by telephone using live interviewers on January 29-31, 2010. The sample included 170 interviews with respondents from cell-phone-only households.

Among those polled, some key groups said the government should continue to play a vital role in maintaining a healthy housing market. For example, 78% of all potential home buyers, including 81% of renters intending to buy a home in the near future, said the government should continue to support housing.

Roughly 65% of home owners said the government also needs to do more to keep families from losing their homes. Support for more foreclosure protection was not confined merely to current home owners. Among renters, 84% said the government needs to do more to helped strapped borrowers. This issue is particularly important to women, with 71% supporting greater foreclosure protection, compared to 58% of men.

Keeping families in their homes is also particularly important to first-time home buyers, as 78% of young adults under age 30 support greater foreclosure protection. And 69% of adults who are 30 to 44, the prime age range for move-up buyers, said they support more foreclosure protection.

Overall, roughly two-in-three respondents said they own their home. Among renters, about two-in-three intend to buy a home in the near future. In addition, 15% of current home owners intend to buy a home in the near future.

The poll asked respondents for their views regarding the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 that extended a tax credit of up to $8,000 for qualified first-time home buyers purchasing a principal residence. The legislation, which was signed into law by President Obama in November 2009, also authorized a tax credit of up to $6,500 for qualified repeat home buyers. Overall, 8% of those surveyed said they intend to take advantage of this credit, while another 24% who might have been interested in using the tax credit said they cannot afford to purchase a home at this time. Of the 33% of respondents who said they are planning to buy a home (both renters and current home owners), roughly 17% said they intend to use the tax credit.

Financial concerns continue to be the greatest barrier to growth in the housing market. Among renters nationwide who aspire to own their own home, 39% simply don’t have the money to buy a home at this time, and another 20% said the primary obstacle is that they feel they cannot qualify for a loan. Larger economic issues also play a role, as 18% of those surveyed said that job security is the greatest obstacle they face in trying to buy a home.

Weakness in the housing market itself may be blocking some home owners who would like to buy a new home, as 29% of current home owners said their greatest obstacle to purchasing another home is their inability to sell their current home. Beyond that, among current homeowners who aspire to buy a new home, 7% feel trapped by a mortgage that exceeds the value of their current home, 14% fear that the value of a new home might fall after they make the investment, and 13% say home prices are too high to allow them to buy a new home at this time.

Even amid a housing market downturn, 40% of respondents said their home is their most valuable investment, twice the number who cite any other single investment–401k accounts, savings accounts and CDs, stocks and bonds, or mutual funds–as their leading family investment.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 4, 2010

2-10 Home Buyers Warranty

Starting January 1, 2010, a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandate will change the way your clients' home air conditioners are serviced and repaired. At that time, manufacturing HVAC equipment that primarily utilizes Freon® (also known as R-22 and HCFC-22) will be banned, and the nation will begin using products such as Puron® (also known as R-410A) as the standard refrigerant for air conditioners. This change will affect your buyers and sellers in many ways. Costs will increase
A variety of factors will lead to increased costs:

•R-22 parts may no longer be available.
•Since R-410A parts are not always interchangeable with R-22 parts, replacement of the entire system might be necessary.
•Physical changes to your system may be needed to accommodate the larger equipment required in air conditioners using R-410A refrigerant.
•The supply of R-22 refrigerant will be limited, causing the price to increase.
•Repairs may take longer because you may want to explore your options and wait for less expensive parts, if they are available.
•New HVAC equipment may be more expensive to purchase and install

Manufacturers' warranties may not provide full coverage
Typical manufacturers' warranties only cover parts for one year, in most cases. Labor is a significant part of any repair. Each manufacturer may take a different position if an R-22 system cannot be repaired or parts are not available.
System and appliance warranties/ service contracts typically exclude coverage resulting from government-mandated changes

Most system and appliance home service contracts/warranties contain language that effectively excludes the additional costs resulting from this government-mandated change. Each home service contract may deal with this situation differently.
Your Disclosure Responsibility
You may want to consult a licensed real estate attorney to determine if there are specific disclosure requirements.

You may also want to:
•Consider adding a disclosure form that details the potential impact of the new refrigeration requirements with all home sales.
•Offer a home service contract/ warranty on each transaction that includes R-410A coverage from a company that covers the transition.
•Have the parties to the transaction sign the disclosure form as evidence that they were made aware of the R-410A issue and were offered a home service contract/ warranty.
•Select a company with R-410A coverage in the base plan. This can be far too costly for your home buyers, to leave to chance or options

2-10 Home Buyers WarrantySM has taken proactive steps to address this change by upgrading our coverage to include R-410A covering costly upgrades, reducing your liability and eliminating risk to homeowners. Visit www.R410ASolutions.com to answer all your questions concerning the impact of this new government mandate to you and your clients or call 877-777-3188 to deliver real time answers to agents and homeowners.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

News Channel 4-Interview with Ashley Dugger

In case you missed the interview last night, click here to watch the exclusive interview.

Labels: , , , , ,

Restaurant Wednesday!

Ombi is a warm, modern space on Elliston Place, bringing contemporary dining to Midtown Nashville. Chef Jason Love and bar manager Terrell Raley serve inventive and flavorful food and cocktails.

Location:
2214 Elliston Place
Nashville

615.320.5350
ombirestaurant.com

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

News Channel 4 Tonight with Ashley Dugger!!!!

Ashley Dugger with the Fine Living Group will be interviewed on News Channel 4 tonight at 6:00pm. Tune in to see Ashley comment on the biggest mistakes that home buyers make. You won't want to miss this!

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, March 1, 2010

Long-Term Rates Rise to Over 5% for First Time in Three Weeks

RISMEDIA, February 27, 2010—Freddie Mac recently released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 5.05% with an average 0.7 point for the week ending February 25, 2010, up from last week when it averaged 4.93%. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 5.07%.

The 15-year FRM this week averaged 4.40% with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.33%. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 4.68%.

The 5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 4.16% this week, with an average 0.6 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.12%. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 5.06%.

The 1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 4.15% this week with an average 0.6 point, down from last week when it averaged 4.23%. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 4.81%.

“Interest rates for 30-year fixed mortgages followed long-term bond yields higher and rose above 5% this week amid a mixed set of economic data reports” said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist. “For instance, the January producer price index jumped well above the market consensus, but the consumer price index remained subdued and consumer confidence declined to the lowest level since April 2009, according to the Conference Board.

“There were also varying reports as to the current state of the housing market. The S&P/Case-Shiller national home price index rose for the third consecutive quarter in the fourth quarter, albeit at a slower rate, and the 20-city composite index showed an increase in December 2009 for the seventh month in a row; six metropolitan areas experienced positive year-over-year growth, compared to four in November. New home sales, however, unexpectedly slowed in January to the smallest pace since records began in 1963, and the supply of homes at the current sales rate rose to 9.1 months, the most since May 2009.”

Labels: , , , , , , ,